Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Buecking

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2013No. 87680-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILE IN CLERKS O,ICE 8UPRI:ME COURT, STATE OF VMIIINCJION DATE DEC 2 6 2013 l%~c~. CHISFIJUS . IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Marriage of ) ) No. 87680-1 AMY BUECKING, ) ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) EnBanc ) TIM BUECKING, ) ) Petitioner. ) Filed DEC 2 6 2013 1 MADSEN, C.J.-Amy Westman filed for legal separation from Tim Buecking. Over a year later, she filed an amended petition for dissolution of marriage. By statute, a court cannot enter a decree of dissolution of marriage until 90 days after the petition is filed. Here, the decree was entered 8 days too soon.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API