Legal Opinion

Boidya v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 10, 2006No. 03-73399Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Allen Rupok Boidya, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We review the BIA’s decision for substantial evidence and will reverse “only if the applicant shows that the evidence compels the conclusion that the asylum decision was incorrect.” Xiaoguang Gu v. Gonzales, 429 F.3d 1209, 1212-13 (9th Cir.2005) (citations omitted). Because substantial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Valentina A. Nagoulko v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Shpetim Hoxha v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Taty Lieana Tearsa Sael, Orville Wright Manariangkuba v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API