Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Broomfield

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 17, 2021No. 3:20-cv-07559Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TORIANO GERMAINE HUDSON, Case No. 20-cv-07559-EMC 8 Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v. Docket No. 1 10 RON BROOMFIELD, 11 Respondent. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Toriano Germaine Hudson filed this pro se action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 16 28 U.S.C. § 2254. His petition is now before the court for review pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2243

17 and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. His in 18 forma pauperis application also is before the Court for review. 19 II.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Frank ContrerezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API