Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kennedy

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 15, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Hearing of exceptions to the report of a referee. The facts appear in the opinion of the Surrogate.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The good faith of the administratrix is found by the referee, and is manifest from the testimony. I am of opinion, therefore, that in the exercise of the discretion lodged in the court by the law with reference to imposing the penalty of compound interest, I must overrule the referee in that regard.

Compound interest is allowable in cases of gross delinquency, or as a penalty for negligence or wrong doing, or for some clear violation of a trust. There is no uniform rule of redress, but each case calls for *217the exercise of the judicial discretion of the court. Thorn v. Garner, 42…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Cruce v. CruceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Utica Insurance v. LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  4. Lansing v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Duffy v. DuncanNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Goetschius' EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API