Legal Opinion

Erisman v. Kerwin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County; before Henry W. Scott, District Judge. Action by J. J. Kerwin against E. W. Erisman. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

This was an action brought by J. J. Kerwin, defendant in error, and plaintiff in the court below, in the district court of Oklahoma county, against E. W. Erisman, .plaintiff in error, and defendant in the court below, for an accounting, for dissolution of partnership, and for the appointment of a receiver to take charge of the partnership property, pending the litigation and the settlement of their partnership affairs. After a receiver had been appointed by the court, and the issues joined, the court, by agreement of both parties, referred the case to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Railroad Equipment Company v. . BlairNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Merchant's National Bank v. PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mellon v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Town of Eufaula v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Murphy v. PattersonMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Shannon Ex Rel. Shannon v. Petherbridge Ex Rel. Estate of ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. Davis v. Indian Territory Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API