Legal Opinion

Callaway v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1917Published

Complaint. Before Judge Sheppard. Tattnall superior- court. May 20, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This case was here on a former occasion, when this court held that no case of equitable accounting was alleged; and that “The allegations respecting the execution of the note to Y. and C. in behalf of C. and P., in excess of the amount agreed on, with intent to defraud P., and the payment of the judgment on the note by P., sufficiently state a case of tort.” Callaway v. Pearson, 139 Ga. 540 (77 S. E. 816). When the case was returned to the lower court for a second trial, certain amendments to the petition were filed and allowed, but they did not so change the character of the action as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Callaway v. PearsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Nessmith Lumber Co. v. Berrien County BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API