Legal Opinion

Groth v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 18, 1935No. Docket No. 74965Published

EARNED INCOME. - Income received in compromise of a claim for liquidated damages or penalty upon the cancellation of a contract is not "earned income" within the meaning of section 31(a)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1928.

1Opinion of the Court

EARL GROTH, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Groth v. Commissioner

Docket No. 74965.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

32 B.T.A. 796; 1935 BTA LEXIS 888;

June 18, 1935, Promulgated

EARNED INCOME. - Income received in compromise of a claim for liquidated damages or penalty upon the cancellation of a contract is not "earned income" within the meaning of section 31(a)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1928.

Earl Groth pro se.

James H. Yeatman, Esq., for the respondent.

LEECH

OPINION.

LEECH: The respondent determined a deficiency in income tax against petitioner in the sum of $337.50 for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Groth v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API