Legal Opinion

Scoggins v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 17, 2001No. A00A2158PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Presiding Judge.

We granted the application of Robert Clayton Scoggins for an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress. Because the search of Scoggins’s car after he fled from a traffic stop and then attempted to flee on foot was permissible as a search incident to arrest, we affirm on that basis and do not reach the issue of whether an inventory search was properly conducted.

‘Where the evidence on a motion to suppress is uncontroverted and credibility is not an issue, we review the evidence and the application of the law thereto de novo, construing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Almond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Fortson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HerediaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Prather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Tutu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API