Legal Opinion

Lot 1555 Corp. v. Nahzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered November 24, 2009, which, to the extent appealed as limited by the briefs, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the action on the basis of res judicata, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

“[W]here there is a valid final judgment the doctrine of res judicata, or claim preclusion, bars future litigation between those parties on the same causes of action” (Matter of Hodes v Axelrod, 70 NY2d 364, 372 [1987]). This doctrine is based on the principle that a “judgment in one action is conclusive in a later one not only as to any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Hodes v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Nahzi v. LieblichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LESNIAK, HILARY v. WELLS FARGO BANK NAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Vince's Pizza Plus, Inc. v. Dion DeFedericisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API