Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Frazier

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 1956No. 8 Div. 849PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The only question in this case is one of fact. That is, whether the instrument admitted to probate in the probate court was executed by Otis B. Hancock as his will. A bill was filed in equity to contest the will under section 64, Title 61, Code.

At the outset it is important to know where is the burden of proof. When there is a contest in the probate court under section 52, Title 61, Code, the burden of proof is on the proponent and remains with him throughout to prove to the reasonable satisfaction of the court or jury trying the issue that the instrument was duly executed and is valid.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCutchen v. LogginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Mindler v. CrockerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Mathews v. FornissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Smith v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Smith v. YoungMississippi Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. MinnifieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Ray v. McClellandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  3. Anderton v. LathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Dorough v. RicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  5. Dorough v. RicksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API