Legal Opinion

United States v. Kronfeld

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 12, 1916No. 1666PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38962.

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The subject of the importation here was classified by the collector in accordance with the advisory report of the appraiser, which is as follows:

The merchandise described on the invoice as wood-shaving ropings consists of an article resembling chenille, composed of cotton and chip, chip chief value, used for festooning, decoration, etc. It was returned for duty as a manufacture of which chip is the component material of chief value at 20 per cent ad valorem, paragraph 368, act of 1913.

We insert here the material part of paragraph 368:

368. Manufactures of bone, chip, grass, * ⅜ - * or of which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomsen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Tuska v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. P. L. Thomas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API