Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bell Telephone Co. v. Flad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the board of public improvements of the city of St. Louis to grant a permit, or permits, for erecting telephone poles upon certain streets and alleys in the city of St. Louis, in accordance with the provisions of an ordinance of the city numbered 11,604, by which the subject is regulated. A demurrer to the return was sustained by the circuit court, and, the defendants declining to plead further, a peremptory writ was ordered to issue.

*186The question, for decision, therefore, arises upon the legal sufficiency of the return, and it is this: Whether…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Michigan Telephone Co. v. City of Benton HarborMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State ex rel. National Subway Co. v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. In Re JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. People v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co. v. Mayor of Red LodgeMontana Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API