Legal Opinion

Arthur Mitchell v. City of Naples

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 10, 2018No. 17-40737PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

*368 Danny Mills and Dennis Chartier, the defendants-appellants, were each mayors of the City of Naples, Texas, at times when the plaintiff was employed by the City. Arthur Mitchell, the plaintiff-appellee, is an African-American man who claims that the defendants paid two specific white employees at a higher rate than he was paid, in violation of Mitchell's constitutional right to equal protection of the law. The defendants claimed qualified immunity, which the district court denied. The defendants appeal this denial. We reverse.

I

A

Mitchell is an African-American man…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hathaway v. BazanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Maritza Amador v. Bexar CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Allen v. Mississippi Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022
  3. Armstrong v. CainDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
  4. Cargill v. CMC PharmacyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
  5. Cordova v. Louisiana State University Health Science CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API