Legal Opinion · Dissent

New York Life Insurance Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 26, 1997No. 20-1966Published

1DissentRader, Circuit Judge

The Tucker Act does not permit this court to address this case without sending New York Life Insurance Company back to bring a proper tax refund action. Repeatedly the Supreme Court has clarified that this court may not imply a waiver of sovereign immunity. United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535, 538, 100 S.Ct. 1349, 1351-52, 63 L.Ed.2d 607 (1980); United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4, 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502-03, 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). Instead each litigant seeking recovery of money from the United States must show an express waiver of sovereign immunity which confers the right to bring the suit.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API