Legal Opinion

Smith v. Thermo-Fax Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 25, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

53 N.J. Super. 102 (1958)

146 A.2d 544

ANNABELLE SMITH AND ROBERT SMITH, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

THERMO-FAX CORP., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided November 25, 1958.

Mr. Milton Malkin, attorney for plaintiffs.

Messrs. Schneider, Lustbader & Morgan, attorneys for defendant.

SCHERER, J.S.C.

Defendant moves to quash service of the summons in the above matter on the ground that "there is no such defendant as served." Defendant, in its affidavit attached to the notice of motion, states that its correct corporate name is Thermo-Fax Sales Incorporated, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whalen v. YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Whalen v. YoungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. In Re Estate of RogersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Welsh v. Bd. of Ed. of Tewksbury Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Galler v. SlurzbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Great Gorge Country ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  2. Eskon v. Four Star Realty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Drazin v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API