Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 12, 2015No. 11-1324PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

Concurring opinion by Circuit Judge TATEL.

Dissenting opinion by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

Pursuant to the Military Commissions Act of 2006, 10 U.S.C. §§ 948a et seq. (“2006 MCA”), a law of war military commission convened at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, found Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman al Bahlul guilty of material support for terrorism, solicitation of others to commit war crimes, and inchoate conspiracy to commit war crimes. The court, sitting en banc, vacated Bahlul’s convictions for material support and solicitation as violative of…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. John Doe v. MattisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  3. Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
  4. John Doe v. James MattisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Omar Khadr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API