Thompson v. Meuschke
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
— Appellant (defendant) accurately presents this case on appeal as “one brought by respondent [plaintiff] to quiet in her the title to an entire tract of real property,” described throughout the record as the “corner” property.
Prior to April 14, 1953, title to the property stood in plaintiff’s name. On that date, the parties entered into a written agreement that stated the property
“. . . is owned by the First and Second Parties in the following proportion: Sixty (60%) per cent in Dolly Thompson, and forty (40%) per cent in Arthur J. Meuschke.”
The disposition of this case turns on the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Conger v. Cordes Towing Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1961