Legal Opinion

O'NEILL v. Alford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1972No. 15966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDEN, Justice.

Mr. Alford brought this suit for a declaratory judgment against Mr. O’Neill, the executor of the will of Mrs. Alice Marshall, asserting that as devisee of 69 shares of Eastman Kodak Co. stock he is entitled to receive the shares resulting from a two-for-one stock split effected by Eastman Kodak after execution of the will but before the death of Mrs. Marshall.

After a non-jury hearing, the trial court entered a judgment awarding the shares in question to Mr. Alford. On appeal Mr. O’-Neill’s points of error are that the trial court erred by 1) failing to consider the intent of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bergin v. BerginTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Cleveland v. ClevelandTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Houston Land & Trust Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. EmrieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. In Re Estate of KirkwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. Hines, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  2. Matter of Estate of Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  3. Opperman v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  4. Morriss v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API