Legal Opinion

Woodruff Pellom v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1964No. 17567PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Pellom has appealed from final order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion to vacate sentence. 1 The present motion filed November 22, 1963, is defendant’s fourth motion collaterally attacking his conviction. 2

The present motion attacks the convie-tjon upon different grounds than urged in the prior motions. After considering the present motion on its merits, the court determined that the defendant was entitled to no relief under either Rule 35 or 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and denied the motion, This appeal followed,

Defendant, represented by counsel of his own choosing, entered a voluntary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Ernest Eugene Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  3. David Jackson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. James Gilbert GlassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  5. Kenneth M. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James Milton Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. Elijah JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  3. Richard Oliver Cain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API