Richardson v. Tobin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the nineteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. This was an action to recover a street assessment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
The plaintiff sues for the recovery of an assessment for street work, performed under proceedings commenced under the Act of April 1st, 1872 (Stats. 1871-2, p. 804), the fourth section of which provides that the resolution expressing the intention of the Board of Supervisors to cause the work to be done shall be published “ for the period of ten days in the paper doing the printing under this law, and also in two daily newspapers, one of which newspapers shall be ¡published as a morning edition, and one as an evening edition, printed and published in said city and county, for ten…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Conners v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Puget Sound Publishing Co. v. Times Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Alley v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Tilton v. RussekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.