Legal Opinion

Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 26, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

nr ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ' DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mw. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court. When this cause was reached on the call of the docket it was submitted by the defendant, in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by § 997 Kev. Stat. At the last term the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We, therefore, affirm the judgment without opening the record.

Affirm…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boston Hydraulic Gold Min. Co. v. Eagle Copper & Silver Min. CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BlockDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
  2. Boston Hydraulic Gold Min. Co. v. Eagle Copper & Silver Min. CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API