Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Parker & Waichman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 3, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding for leave to discharge and substitute counsel, Parker & Waichman appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), entered August 25, 1997, which granted the petitioner’s application to be relieved of paying any fees to it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports a finding that the appellant was not entitled to any compensation for its legal services because its discharge by the petitioner was for cause (see, Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 44; Squeri v Fournarakis, 170 AD2d 444). Bracken, J. P., Copertino,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Squeri v. FournarakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API