Legal Opinion
State v. Seigel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 20, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
139 N.J. Super. 373 (1975)
354 A.2d 103
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM SEIGEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal).
November 20, 1975.
Mr. Gary S. Spagnola, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. C. Judson Hamlin, Prosecutor of Middlesex County, attorney).
Mr. Edward Bloch for defendant.
APPLEBY, J.S.C.
Defendant is charged with violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:115-1.8, the sale of obscene material, as defined by N.J.S.A. 2A:115-1.7, to persons under 18 years of age. It is defendant's contention that he cannot be found guilty…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Daniels v. Sanitarium Assn., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. International AmusementsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. International AmusementsUtah Supreme Court · 1977