Legal Opinion

Neville v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1921No. 2639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment for making intoxicating liquor. Before Judge Shurley. Wilkes superior court. April 20, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtPish, C. J.

1. The act to amend and supplement the prohibition laws of this State (Acts Ex. Sess. 1917, p. 7), which, among other provisions, made “ it unlawful to distill, manufacture, or make any alcoholic, spirituous, vinous, or malted liquors or intoxicating beverages in this State,” was not superseded and in effect repealed by the eighteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States and the Volstead act. Smith v. State, 150 Ga. 755, and cases cited (105 S. E. 364); Barbour v. Ben*206ton, Raskin v. Dixon, 151 Ga. 708 (108 S. E. 61); Com. v. Nickerson, 236 Mass. 281 (128 N. E. 273, 10 A. L. R.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. State v. ForeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Raskin v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cooley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Neville v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Winokur v. HarnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API