Legal Opinion
Patrick v. US Tangible Investment Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 1999No. Docket No. 204902PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, P.J.
Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). The motion was based on a claim that this action is subject to an agreement to arbitrate. We affirm.
Plaintiffs filed this action against defendant to recover damages for lost investment value in coins purchased from defendant, a coin dealer in Dallas, Texas. Plaintiffs contacted Patterson Strategy Organization, an original codefendant later dismissed from this action, for investment advice. Plaintiffs were referred to defendant by Patterson. On May 27, 1995,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nation v. W D E Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re WirsingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Pakideh v. Franklin Commercial Mortgage Group, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pamar Enterprises, Inc. v. Huntington BanksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- St Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. IngallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Costs and Attorney FeesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- 46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Powell Production, Inc. v. Jackhill Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- 46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re BaylessUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.