Legal Opinion
Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. City of Philadelphia
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 7, 2002PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.
The Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5(FOP) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) which dismissed as moot a Complaint filed in Mandamus (Complaint) against the City of Philadelphia and John Street, in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Philadelphia (collectively, City). We affirm.
FOP is the collective bargaining agent of the City’s police officers. City and FOP are parties to a collective bargaining agreement governed by the Act of June 24, 1968, P.L. 237, as amended, 43 P.S. §§ 217.1-217.10 (Act 111). In the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Philadelphia Gas Works Ex Rel. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Borough of Marcus Hook v. Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Borough of Nazareth v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. DenticiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mistich v. COM., BD. OF PROBATION AND PAROLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Driscoll v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Phila.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Dubin v. County of NorthumberlandCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Baublitz v. Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- D. Douglas v. PPBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.