Legal Opinion
National Australia Bank v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 22, 2006No. 05-5702PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
In this Winstar-related case, the United States appeals a judgment of the Court of Federal Claims granting summary judgment of liability for breach of contract and awarding expectation damages to appellee National Australia Bank (“NAB”). Nat’l Australia Bank v. United, States, 55 Fed. Cl. 782 (2003) (“Summary Judgment Decision”), Nat’l Australia Bank v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 352 (2004) (“Damages Decision ”). The Court of Federal Claims exercised jurisdiction pursuant to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1), and entered final judgment on December 29, 2004. We have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Atlas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Dick Pacific/GHEMM, JV ex rel. W.A. Botting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Keeter Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Muskat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.