Legal Opinion

Kelley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 1984No. 83-1169Published

1Per curiam

Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in not admitting the proffered testimony which would have been cumulative. See Sheppard v. State, 322 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Smith v. State, 320 So.2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Sheppard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975