Legal Opinion

Austin v. Healy

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1941No. 26071. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

The plaintiffs, Lewman L. Austin and H. G. Erwin, resident freeholders and taxpayers in the town of Indian Creek, in White county, instituted a suit in the circuit court of that county to enjoin Thomas Healy, clerk, and Charles Reddy, highway commissioner of said town, from issuing and disposing of $16,000 of road bonds which had been voted at an election held pursuant to section 112 of the Roads and Bridges act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, chap. 121, par. 120.) No attack was made upon the proceedings leading to the election or the manner in which it was conducted.

It was alleged in the complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Law v. People ex rel. HuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. City of Springfield v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. People Ex Rel. Carson v. BaxterIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. ThoneNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Civic Auditorium & Convention Center Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Maddux v. BlagojevichIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Conrad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. City of Phoenix v. PHOENIX CIVIC AUD. & CON. CENT.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API