Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Lovette

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 1996No. 15-94-05549; CA A87607PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment entered after he failed to appear for trial. In June 1994, wife filed for dissolution, and, in July, husband filed a response. Trial was set for February 3, 1995. At 2:50 in the afternoon on that date, husband’s counsel moved to postpone the trial. Counsel informed the court that husband was not present and that “he did not tell me why he was leaving, but he did say he was feeling ill.” The court described what occurred:

“[T]he record should reflect that we had a conference in chambers this morning with the parties and — which ended about a quarter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of WeaverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of McCumberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laack v. BotelloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Kharma and AljundiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API