Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Denton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1926No. (3280.)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The appellant assigns errors upon overruling a demurrer and objections to evidence relating to a recovery for destruction of the grass as a “loss of plant food,” and in not awarding a recovery of the costs of the county court. These assignments should be sustained. Grass growing in the soil may have value for pasturage or hay, considered as a crop. Turf and grass roots may also have value as “plant food” in the soil, causing the land to produce more abundantly. But the claim that the destruction of the turf or grass roots was also an injury in the “loss of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fort Worth & New Orleans Railway Co. v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. HogsettTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Mel Foster Co. Properties v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Santa Fe Partnership v. ARCO Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Williams v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API