Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Webster v. Lehndorff Geneva, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 17, 1988No. 69432Published

1DissentWelliver, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

There is no rational or reasonable basis to deny appellants’ ownership of agricultural land for the purpose of farming.

In Carney v. Hanson Oil Co., Inc., 690 S.W.2d 404, 407 (Mo. banc 1985), this Court stated that:

[t]he Equal Protection Clause requires states to treat uniformly all who stand in the same relation to the statute at issue. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964).... In making classifications, the state must proceed upon a rational basis. Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc., v. Bowers, 358 U.S. 522, 79 S.Ct. 437, 3 L.Ed.2d 480 (1959). *809Th…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API