Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kobos by and Through Kobos v. Everts

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1989No. 86-12Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BROWN, Justice, Retired,

dissenting in part and concurring in part.

The majority holds that giving Instruction Number 18 was reversible error. It states that appellants’ challenge to instructions is the principal issue on appeal. The court was particularly wroth because the trial court used the terms “honest judgment” and “honestly” in its instruction, and states that the instruction “bespeaks in responsibility to moral decision and honesty.”

In the context of Instruction Number 18 and the other eight malpractice instructions, it is inconceivable that the jury could have been misled and thought…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Watson v. HockettWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. SubakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Miller v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Smith v. BeardWyoming Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API