Legal Opinion
DESTINY 98 TD v. Miodowski
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 2005No. S-03-1393PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.
This appeal presents the issue of whether a party seeking confirmation of a judicial sale in a tax sale certificate foreclosure proceeding is required to give notice of statutory homestead exemption procedures pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1531 (Reissue 1995). We conclude that there is no such requirement.
BACKGROUND
On March 1, 1999, Destiny 98 TD (Destiny 98) purchased Douglas County treasurer’s certificate of tax sale No. 99-01220, representing a tax lien on Lot 7, Block 4, Burlington Place Addition, in Douglas County, Nebraska. On September 11, 2002, Destiny 98 filed an amended petition…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jarrett v. EichlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Sydow v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Salkin v. JacobsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Manske v. ManskeNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. HalfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eicher v. Mid America Financial Investment Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Recio v. EversNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- ACI Worldwide Corp. v. Baldwin Hackett & MeeksNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- State on Behalf of AE v. BuckhalterNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. v. SiegelNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.