OneWest Bank, FSB v. Erickson
Washington Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceGordon McCloud, J.
¶73 (concurring) I agree with the majority that OneWest Bank FSB is entitled to summary judgment, and, accordingly, I concur. I write separately, *75however, because I would not reach the question of whether the Idaho court orders at issue in this case—the order appointing Shelly Bruna as conservator and the subsequent order directing her to facilitate a reverse mortgage of Bill McKee’s Washington residence—are entitled to full faith and credit in Washington.
ANALYSIS
¶74 As the majority notes, the trial court resolved this case without addressing that constitutional question. It concluded instead…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bard v. Charles R. Myers Insurance Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Padron v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- OneWest Bank, FSB v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014