Legal Opinion
Nall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 20, 1981No. 8074PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULPEPPER, Judge.
Bobby R. Nall seeks damages for personal injuries to his minor son, Ricky Lane Nall, sustained in a collision between two automobiles. Named as defendants are (1) Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO), the liability insurer of the automobile in which Ricky was a guest passenger, and (2) State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), which carried uninsured motorist coverages on two vehicles owned by plaintiff. The plaintiff has perfected this appeal from a judgment of the trial court rejecting his demands to stack uninsured motorist coverages.
The facts…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Breaux v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Courville v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Guillot v. Travelers Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Coco v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Courville v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Duhe v. Maryland Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Fox v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Harry Boudreaux, Cross-Appellant v. Optimum Insurance Company, Continental Insurance Companies and Safeco Insurance Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. PinderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.