Legal Opinion

Pordum v. Nyquist

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without prejudice to any claim appellant may have against the Commissioner of Education.

The salient facts are outlined in the memorandum at the Appellate Division.

As it appears that a hearing panel, convened pursuant to Part 83 of the regulations of the commissioner, has heard the evidence and determined that the permanent certificate issued to appellant should not be revoked, that part of the proceeding brought to have such panel convened and such hearing held is now moot and is not reached. Similarly, as the Com*959missioner of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jerry v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newton v. Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Calvin K. of Oakknoll v. De FrancescoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. East End Resources, LLC v. Town of Southold Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Kurzius v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. East End Resources, LLC v. Town of Southold Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API