Legal Opinion

Town of Rice v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 18, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jo Daviess County; the Hon Joseph M. Bailey, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtLacey, P. J.

This was a suit originally commenced before a justice of the peace by the appellant under Sec. 71, Chap. 121 R. S., known as the “Roads and Bridges act,” to recover the penalty announced in the said section for obstructing a public highway in the town of Rice, the fine being not less than three and- not more than ten dollars for the offense of obstructing a public highway as fixed by the statute.

The case was tried before a justice of the peace and appealed to the Circuit Court, and there tried anew by the court without a jury, resulting in the finding of the court and judgment in favor of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. State Board of Agriculture v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Ward v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Metropolitan City Railway Co. v. Chicago West Division Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1877

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Leadville v. Leadville Sewer Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  2. City of Chicago v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API