Price v. Garland
New Mexico Supreme Court
Motion to retax costs. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.
This case was decided at a former term, and the judgment below reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings. The clerk taxed the costs against the appellee, as directed in general terms by the judgment of reversal, but in so doing he embraced in the bill of costs several large items of expense by appellant in perfecting and docketing his appeal in this court. The items sought by the motion to be stricken out of the taxed cost bill are: First, the cost of printing the record; second, the cost of printing appellant’s brief; third, the amount paid the stenographer for transcribing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Dennis v. EddyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1874
- Ex Parte HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Jennings v. Brig PerseveranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1797
- Coggill v. LawrenceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1851
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.