Legal Opinion

Moore v. American Molasses Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Trial had before the court without a jury in action for damages sustained by breach of a contract.

1Opinion of the CourtRudd, J.

Plaintiff seeks recovery for damages alleged to have been sustained by breach of a contract on the part of the defendant, which contract was made in writing on or about the 1st day of May, 1915, and reads as follows:

‘ ‘ The American Molasses Co. of N. Y.

“ 111 Wall Street, New York.

Ma/y 1st, 1915.

“ Sold to The Moore Bros, oe Albany.
“Albany, N. Y.
“ Terms
“Net Cash.

Quality Mark or Number Price To be Branded

Their full re- “Milkmore” Brand, quirements for Porto Rico Feed one year to Molasses.

May 1, 1916.

Common Blackstrap.

Common Blackstrap.

10c. per gal. in straight carloads to one consignee; 10%e.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Central Iron Works Co. v. United States Radiator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Moore v. American Molasses Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Asahel Wheeler Co. v. MendlesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API