Legal Opinion

Quinn v. City of Detroit

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 29, 1998No. Civ.A 96-40291PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GADOLA, District Judge.

On August 9, 1996, John P. Quinn (“Quinn”) filed the above-entitled action against the City of Detroit (“the City”) seeking monetary damages for the City’s alleged infringement of his copyright to a computer program entitled Litigation Management System/Claims Management System (“LMS”). On December 12, 1997, this Court issued a memorandum opinion and order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment and granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, specifically holding that the City of Detroit does not own the copyright…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Liberty American Insurance Group, Inc. v. Westpoint Underwriters, L.L.C.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
  2. Carson v. Dynegy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Thoroughbred Software International, Inc. v. Dice Corporation, Clifford v. Dice, Fred Wager, and John Does 1-10Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Field v. Google Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  5. Design Basics, LLC v. Chelsea Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API