Legal Opinion
Rathbone v. Fort Pitt Bridge Works
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1937No. 8442PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Judge:
This is an action for damages for personal injury. The plaintiff, Norman Rathbone, an infant, brought suit by his next friend, Thomas J. Rathbone. The defendant is Fort Pitt Bridge Works, a corporation. There was verdict against the defendant for $12,000.00. To a judgment on the verdict, the defendant prosecutes this writ of error.
About nine o’clock P. M., Saturday, August 4, 1934, Thomas J. Rathbone, his wife and their son, the plaintiff, Norman Rathbone, then of the age nine and one-half years, were driving from the City of Moundsville in an automobile southward on State…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Klatt v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Raymond v. KesebergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Weirs v. Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Mullen v. Town of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
- City of Richmond v. PooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Primus v. City of Hot SpringsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Cline v. Evans and TallmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Orlando v. MontfortDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Primus v. City of Hot SpringsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953