Legal Opinion

Narragansett Indian Tribe v. State of Rhode Island and UTGR, Inc. d/b/a Twin River and Newport Grand, LLC (Intervenors)

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 4, 2015No. 2012-322-AppealPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice INDEGLIA,

for the Court.

The plaintiff, the Narragansett Indian Tribe (Tribe), appeals from the entry of partial summary judgment in the Superior Court in favor of the defendant, the State of Rhode Island (state), and the intervenor defendant, UTGR, Inc. d/b/a Twin River (UTGR), finding that the 2011 Casino Act, G.L. 1956 chapter 61.2 of title 42 (Casino Act or the act) is not facially unconstitutional. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

I

Facts and Travel

Much of the background of the lengthy disputes between the state and the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Hill Capital, LLC v. City of Providence, by and through its Treasurer, James LombardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2020
  2. Finnimore & Fisher Inc. d/b/a Island Moped v. Town of New ShorehamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2023
  3. Kristin Riley v. The Narragansett Pension BoardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2022
  4. Providence Place Group Limited, Partnership v. State of Rhode Island, acting by and through Division of TaxationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API