Legal Opinion

Millen v. Potter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. Docket No. 75PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Bill by Homer C. Millen and another against Nathan S. Potter and another for an accounting, and asking that defendant be decreed to issue certain stock to complainants, and for other relief. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtPerson, J.

This suit was brought to enforce the assignment and delivery by defendant Potter to com*263plainants of certain stock in the defendant corporation and for the performance of certain other features of an alleged agreement between defendant Potter and Homer C. Millen, one of the complainants.

The Millen Portland Cement Company became an involuntary bankrupt in August, 1909. In October of the same year the Union Bank of Jackson began the foreclosure of a mortgage which covered all the prop-’ erty of the company. On the 1st day of June, 1910, the property was sold under the foreclosure and bid in for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stroh Ranch Development, LLC v. Cherry Creek South Metropolitan District No. 2District Court, D. Colorado · 2013
  2. Redfern v. R E Dailey & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Detroit Bank & Trust Co. v. CoopesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Millen v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API