Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Koppelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*734Appeal from an order granting motion of defendant savings bank to dismiss the amended complaint as to it, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that each of the three causes of action is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. The paucity of facts in the amended complaint and the affidavits in support of and in opposition to the motion make it impossible to determine that the actions are barred by the Statute of Limitations. The question may be raised again when the real situation is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Croop v. OdetteNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Long Island Rail Road v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. Wear v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Palidoro v. Feuer Transportation, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API