Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. North Savannah Properties, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 12, 2012No. 2011-12784PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JORDAN, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Darby Bank & Trust Co., appeals an order of the district court remanding the action to state court. The district court determined that it did not have subject-matter jurisdiction because the FDIC had not been formally substituted as a party in the state court action prior to removal. After review, and with the benefit of oral argument, we vacate the district court’s remand order. We hold that, as a matter of federal law, the FDIC is “substituted as a party” in a state court proceeding under 12 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. StudeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Cook v. Randolph County, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lindley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Quintero Community Ass'n v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- SA Palm Beach, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- Robert R. Turner v. Sharon W. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Vistas de Canovanas I, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.