Weekley v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion for postconvietion relief. Defendant did not meet his burden of demonstrating “that his counsel did not provide reasonably effective performance and that, absent counsel’s deficient performance, the jury would have reached a different result.” Williams v. State, 515 So.2d 1042, 1043 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The trial court properly determined that defendant was not entitled to relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996