Lee v. State

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

A trial judge found attorney Jerome Lee to be in contempt of court and ordered him to serve ten days in jail. Lee appeals, asserting three enumerations of error. Because the enumerated errors are without merit, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

1. Lee’s first enumeration of error, that his actions do not constitute criminal contempt and thus the trial court abused its discretion in finding that they do, is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court’s judgment. On appeal from a criminal contempt conviction, we review the evidence…