Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Hixon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 9, 1918No. 1 Div. 30PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Monroe County ; Ben D. Turner, Judge. Bill by Mabala McKenzie and others against Carl Hixon and others. Ffom a decree denying relief to complainants, and granting relief to defendants on their answer, treated as a cross-bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

The appellants filed this bill against the appellees to quiet title to the land described therein. The appellees constituted their answer a cross-bill wherein they sought the affirmation that the title to the land in question was in them. The appellants trace their claim of interest in the land from Aaron McKenzie, who died about 1913. The appellees (cross-complainants) rely for their title upon a deed, of date August 7, 1891, from Aaron and Mahala McKenzie to Alfred C. and Liston A. Hixon. The court below sustained and confirmed the claim of the appellees (cross-complainants) to the land in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crook v. Newborg & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Pegues v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Butler v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Woodmen of the World v. AlfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Little v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Fair v. CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API