Legal Opinion

Steinhauer & Wight Inc. v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1915No. 5872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint; from municipal court of Atlanta. June SO, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

1. Where in a contract for the sale of an automobile the time of delivery is not fixed otherwise than by a stipulation that the automobile will be delivered “as early as possible,” parol evidence is admissible to explain the meaning of the term “as early as possiblo,” as it was understood by the contracting parties at the time of making the contract, and testimony on this point is not subject to the objection that it tends to vary the terms of the written instrument.

2. Upon the breach of a contract of sale, the vendor may recover such damages as naturally arise according to the usual course…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marsh v. BairdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Murphey v. Northeastern Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Allison Lumber Co. v. Decatur Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Jim Ellis Volkswagen, Inc. v. MillicanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API